By Hazel Burton Today we launch our 2019 Threats of the Year report; a look back at the major tools and tactics that cybercriminals have exploited over the past year.
Based on original research conducted for our ‘Threat of the Month‘ blog series, we look into the impact of directed attacks against specific organizations, and how we can defend ourselves against these types of attack.
We also look at non-direct attacks – the attacks that are more of a numbers game for cybercriminals. In this case they are looking to hit as many victims as possible, without regard for the organizations or individuals that they affect.
Finally, we look at the cybercriminal ‘toolkit‘. From remote access trojans, to hiding threats in encrypted traffic, we’ve seen various innovations in how cybercriminals have evaded detection this year.
As we look towards the end of the year (and decade), we also sought perspectives from Cisco Security experts looking back at 2019. When asked what one particular threat stood out this year, and to offer a New Year’s resolution for 2020 that all organizations could consider adopting, here’s what they said:
Martin Lee, Talos (Cisco Threat Intelligence)
This year will be remembered as the year when we saw that DNS data, as well as TLS certificates, could be ‘fake news‘.
Although sporadic malicious activity had previously compromised DNS data, the discovery of the Sea Turtle campaign showed that DNS information could be compromised wholesale by attackers taking over top-level registries.
Consequently, legitimate domain-validated TLS certificates were granted to the attackers – since they controlled the domain’s DNS entries, meaning that the impersonation checking within TLS connections was subverted also. Attackers could thus divert a user from accessing a legitimate system to connect them to a malicious server while presenting a valid TLS certificate to authenticate the connection.
New Year’s resolution for 2020
Enable multi-factor authentication on every system that can support it. Passwords have never been a 100 percent effective or a secure mechanism for authenticating users. You can add two-factor authentication (2-FA) to all your system accounts so that even if someone steals or cracks your password, they can’t impersonate you to gain access to valuable data.
Andrea Kaiser, Cisco Umbrella (Protecting the DNS layer)
Malspam, or malicious unwanted email is still the predominant method used to cast a wide net and get up close and personal with the most vulnerable part of a network: users.
In 2019 we saw the Emotet botnet continue to spread malicious payloads and grow its victim base, expanding its malware-as-a-service tactic. Trickbot, Qakbot, IcedID, and Gootkit all spread through malicious document attachments as some of the payloads pushed by the Emotet botnet in 2019.
Emotet added the ability to hijack email threads by injecting responses into old or ongoing conversations from users‘ email. The new response can include links or malicious attachments to download Emotet.
This is all possible due to Emotet’s ability to steal email content and mail account credentials. The initial access and further propagation of the botnet relies on the distribution of malspam. This past year showed that we need to be vigilant in looking for targeted social engineering attacks in our inboxes.
New Year’s resolution for 2020
Social engineering is a threat that can affect you regardless of it being used as a tactic of malware. It can be used in any social setting to gain sensitive information. Often times, all one needs to start the process is a tiny bit of information about a person – such as the year you graduated or the city in which you were born. That one seed of information can lead to a path to compromise your personal data. My recommendation for your New Year’s resolution is to limit the online availability of your personal information. Take a look out our Consumer Data Privacy report to learn more.
Patrick Garrity, Cisco Duo (Access/Multi-Factor Authentication Security)
For those of us in access security (endpoint and MFA), we’re concerned about exploits targeting device operating system and browser software.
This year, two major examples affected the Google Chrome browser, including a zero-day vulnerability impacting all major operating systems, including Windows, Apple’s MacOS and Linux.
The vulnerability was a ‘use-after-free‘ type, which is a memory corruption flaw that allows a threat actor to exploit modified data in the memory of a machine and escalate privileges on that machine. This means if a user opens a PDF in a compromised Chrome browser, an attacker can hijack the browser to gain access to their machine.
While Google quickly released a patch to protect against this vulnerability, it’s an important example to highlight the importance of gaining visibility into your users‘ endpoints running out-of-date software and browsers.
New Year’s Resolution for 2020
Make sure your devices are up to date by regularly obtaining visibility into the security status of your users‘ devices. Then notify users of their out-of-date software and enforce policies that require software updates before allowing access to applications. Or, block access from any device that doesn’t meet your organization’s policies or requirements.
To find out more about these and other threats of 2019, download the Cisco 2019 Threats of the Year report.
Sign up here to receive our Threat of the Month blog series.
We will be holding a Cisco Live chat on this threat report on 17th December at 9am PST. Tune in on Cisco.com or via any of our social channels – Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and our Security Community.
We encourage you to use this retrospective report in any security-focused board meetings or business planning sessions you might be holding over the next few months to guide you on planning the security tools and processes needed for 2020. You can also use it as a resource to help explain how your current security posture would perform with any such attacks, and identify any gaps.
The post A Look Back at the Major Cyber Threats of 2019 appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Talos Group Introduction
Cisco Talos‘ Systems Security Research Team investigates software, operating system, IOT and ICS vulnerabilities in order to discover them before malicious threat actors do. We provide this information to the affected vendors so that they can create patches and protect their customers as soon as possible. We strive to improve the security of our customers with detection content, which protects them while the vendor is creating, testing, and delivering the patch. These patches ultimately remove the vulnerability in question, which increases security not only for our customers but for everyone. After these patches become available, the Talos detection content becomes public, as well. Talos regularly releases executive blogs (Vulnerability Spotlights) and in-depth analyses of vulnerabilities discovered by us. You can find all of the release information via the Talos Vulnerability Information page here.
Read the rest of the details on the Talos Blog
The post Talos Vulnerability Discovery Year in Review – 2019 appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Ben Munroe Four million. According to the latest study, that’s the approximate number of cybersecurity jobs around the world that still need to be filled by skilled professionals. With the current cybersecurity workforce measured at 2.8 million, it would need to grow by 145 percent for us to catch up. The same study done last year indicated a shortage of nearly 3 million professionals – meaning the number has already grown by more than one million people in a year. This poses so many questions. Chief among them: Is it real?
To put this into further perspective, the entire population of the City of Los Angeles is roughly 4 million. Therefore, in order to fill our current skills gap, every single person who lives in L.A. would need to work in the cybersecurity industry (plus a few more). Four million is also greater than the entire population of many countries – including Iceland, Qatar, Jamaica, and Mongolia, just to name a few. So, yeah, it’s a large number.
Have we created too many tools that all need managing, generating more alerts than can be attended to? Is it even possible to find, train, hire, and retain such a massive number of new security professionals?
Many have suggested widening the candidate pool and providing more training to alleviate this colossal problem. While these are of course logical solutions that we should definitely be pursuing, they will never increase our workforce by 145 percent. It’s just not feasible.
So should we just give up and let the bad actors win? Absolutely not. What we need to do is focus on a new solution. Yes, people are an essential piece of the puzzle, but we also have technology and processes to augment our talent.
The Business of Complexity
Historically, the security industry has innovated like crazy to keep up with attackers (and will continue to do so). We see a problem, and we build a box.
For example, malware starting to run amok through your environment? Time to buy some anti-malware technology. Your employees getting duped by phishing attacks? Better look into anti-phishing measures! Expanding into the cloud? What’s the best cloud security solution on the market? And so on…
While innovation is necessary and wonderful, it has created unmanageable complexity for many organizations. For each new product we create, we require more people to manage it. Therefore, instead of proactively protecting your environment, you’re frantically toggling between countless security applications all day just to triage the biggest issues. Or you’re spending all your time trying to integrate disparate solutions on your own.
VC funding in the cybersecurity space totaled $5.3 billion in 2018, up 20 percent from $4.4 billion in 2017. More venture capital means more companies, means more tools, and potentially more job openings. This does not seem like it’s moving in the right direction.
According to Cisco’s 2019 CISO Benchmark Study, 79 percent of respondents find it challenging to orchestrate security alerts from multiple vendors‘ products. And almost a third of respondents said they were suffering from “cyber fatigue” – meaning they have all but given up on trying to stay ahead of malicious threats and bad actors. Yikes! So, what can we do about this challenge without adding millions of people to our workforce?
A Platform Approach to Security
At Cisco, we’re continuing to innovate our respective security technologies to keep pace with attackers. And at the same time, we’re placing greater emphasis on making these technologies more effective and easier to work with. We’re calling it our platform approach to security – because a platform supported by a dozen pillars is stronger than just the pillars themselves.
Through this platform approach, we are leveraging integration, automation, and machine learning so that our technologies are working for you – not the other way around. The technologies you purchase to secure your environment should be making things easier for you, not harder.
Yes, we offer a lot of security products, because let’s face it, there are many different types of threats out there and infinite ways for them to get in. But let’s not lose sight of the forest for the trees. At the end of the day, the goal is a seamless, holistic security platform that allows a threat to be detected in one area of the enterprise and be blocked everywhere else – from the data center, network, and cloud, to email, the web, endpoints, and everywhere in between. We want to build a system whose components talk to one another and work together as a team to thwart attackers.
The Proof Is in the Platform
We have been ramping up towards this platform with some of our previous security portfolio synergies. For example, where the Cisco AnyConnect VPN leaves off, Cisco Umbrella kicks in – protecting users whether they are on or off the network. Additionally, Cisco AMP for Endpoints stretches across the portfolio to automatically receive actionable intelligence on worldwide threats from sources like Cisco Talos, Threat Grid, and Umbrella, and to integrate with our multi-factor authentication (MFA) solution, Duo. These are just a few of the integrations that already exist among our product set.
Now, we’re taking our platform approach towards the front end to make the integrated portfolio easier to use with Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO) and Cisco Threat Response (CTR). Security teams can now harmonize policies for a multitude of devices – from next-generation firewalls to Meraki – through a single cloud portal using Cisco Defense Orchestrator. We’re enabling customers to maintain consistent policies across firewalls and into the cloud, starting with support for Amazon Web Services (AWS). You can learn more here.
Additionally, organizations can now leverage coordinated incident response across the entire Cisco Security platform with Cisco Threat Response (CTR), which comes free with many of our security products. CTR leverages our integrated security architecture to make threat investigations faster, simpler, and more effective.
Cisco Threat Response

Your Experience Simplified, Your Success Accelerated, Your Future Secured
How will this new approach benefit you? At a high level, we envision this platform enabling customers to:
Reduce complexity with an integrated and open platform that strengthens operations, gets out of the way, and gives you back time.
Champion innovation with a powerful, pervasive platform that keeps you safe as your business pursues what’s ahead.
Future-proof your security strategy and reduce risk with a platform you can rely on, backed by unparalleled resources and expertise.
So that’s what we’ve been up to. And we’ll keep pushing, because the journey is far from over. We’re committed to creating a platform that delivers a better security experience and protects what’s now and what’s next.
In case you missed it, we recently held a virtual summit to officially launch our security platform. Catch the replay and find additional resources here.
The post It’s Time for Security to Work as a Team appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Megha Mehta There’s no doubt that cloud adoption has led to accelerated business outcomes. The flexibility of compute and ease of deployment is empowering for developers. But developing applications in the cloud has challenged security teams who are attempting to ensure the same protections in the cloud as on-premises, without slowing down development. Ultimately, successful organizations are the ones who understand that cloud security is a shared responsibility – that is, the cloud provider is responsible for security of the cloud, and the organization is responsible for security in the cloud.
Cloud providers like Google Cloud understand the access and visibility needed by customers to fulfill their security “in the cloud” role. Google Cloud has recently announced the Packet Mirroring service that clones the traffic of specified instances in a VPC (Virtual Private Cloud) network and forwards this traffic to designated receivers. Packet Mirroring captures all ingress and egress traffic and packet data, such as payloads and headers.
“Traffic visibility is critical to prevent security breaches and attacks as networks grow in complexity,” said Mahesh Narayanan, product manager at Google Cloud. “With Packet Mirroring, our customers now have a way to proactively detect network intrusions, analyze, and diagnose application performance issues for both Compute Engine and Google Kubernetes Engine, across all regions and machine types.”
And this telemetry can be consumed by Cisco Stealthwatch Cloud, a SaaS-based network traffic analysis solution for visibility and threat detection. By collecting and analyzing network meta data, Stealthwatch Cloud can pinpoint anomalies and further reduce them to high-fidelity critical alerts that security teams can easily investigate. In fact, Stealthwatch Cloud users consistently rate more than 90 percent of the alerts they see in the Stealthwatch Cloud dashboard as useful. Additionally, the pervasive visibility provided by Stealthwatch Cloud into network conversations helps organizations ensure compliance, perform faster investigations, and analyze security events in the past through forensic analysis.
Cloud-native security for Google Cloud
The partnership between Cisco and Google Cloud isn’t new. A year ago, Google Cloud announced VPC Flow Logs, and Cisco Stealthwatch Cloud was one of the first solutions to support it. It can be deployed via API in 10 minutes or less without the need for agents. This also ensures Stealthwatch Cloud automatically covers your entire cloud infrastructure as it grows and changes.
Additionally, as many organizations know, one cloud is never enough. Most organizations support two or more public clouds along with their own local datacenter. Multiple application infrastructures can further complicate the life of security personnel where process, tools, and applications all vary by environment. With Stealthwatch Cloud, security teams don’t need to manage multiple security tools for different environments. Stealthwatch Cloud combines telemetry from on-prem, other cloud infrastructures, and virtualized environments to provide a single, unified security view of the organization’s combined network.
Real-world deployment by a service provider customer
Telindus – a Luxembourg-based information technology integrator, cloud, and telecom service provider – deployed Stealthwatch Cloud in their Google Cloud infrastructure and saw immediate results. Telindus was able to detect a number of bad activities such as unusual IPs interacting with the environment, traffic from suspicious countries, denial-of-service attacks, and attempts to steal passwords. “Stealthwatch Cloud was able to find the needle in the haystack,” said Thomas Scherer, Chief Architect at Telindus.
Ensure visibility, threat detection and compliance within your network by signing up for a free 60-day trial of Stealthwatch Cloud.
The post Cisco Stealthwatch Cloud and Google Cloud continue partnership to secure customers appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Don Meyer Network security professionals today clearly understand that there is no longer just one perimeter surrounding the enterprise. Rather, security and network management now extend across multiple, overlapping perimeters, each of which usually has its own firewall and related network equipment.
For security teams and network admins, this translates into the need to oversee and coordinate policy on a potentially large number of separate devices. Cisco Defense Orchestratoris a cloud-based application that enables admins to consistently manage and harmonize policies across a variety of Cisco security products as well as cloud-native tools such as AWS Security Groups.
Users of Cisco Defense Orchestrator shared their experiences with the product on IT Central Station. Their reviews reveal a solution that is appreciated for its simplicity and efficiency. Users also noted that Cisco Defense Orchestrator makes their teams more productive, particularly when managing policies across Cisco ASA, FTD and Meraki MX devices.
The Simplicity of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Cisco Defense Orchestrator is known for enabling streamlined security policy management across an extended network. As Jairo M., Network and Security Specialist at a small tech services company, explained, “The initial setup was really straightforward. If the person setting this up has knowledge of firewalls and switches, it’s pretty simple. It took about two hours for us to deploy.”
Todd E., CTO at a small tech services company, similarly noted, “In terms of visibility and getting everybody involved, it was simple, scalable, and saved them tons of time, which in turn saved them money. Its effect on firewall builds and daily management of firewalls is that it’s super-simple on new deployments.”
Efficiency in Centralization
IT Central Station members remarked that Cisco Defense Orchestrator has made their teams more efficient. According to Mohamed N., an I.T. Manager at a consumer goods company with over 5,000 employees, “This efficient, time-saving, centralized device manager is easy to deploy and requires minimal administrative IT resources.” Todd E. spoke to this point as well, noting, “The simplicity, efficiency, and effectiveness of it are valuable. It’s efficient, simple, and there’s the visibility on the security side. Deployment is fast. As a security person, I love the visibility and the ease of use when doing my upgrades.”
Team Productivity and Support for ASA, FTD and Meraki MX
Network managers and security teams want to manage security policies across multiple Cisco products, including ASA, FTD and Meraki MX devices. The outcome is consistent security across the network. Isiac S., Network Administrator at a manufacturing company with over 200 employees, praised Cisco Defense Orchestrator in this context. He said, “Its support for ASA, FTD, and Meraki MX helps maintain consistent security.”
Todd E. addressed the team productivity aspects of this capability. He said, “When it comes to making bulk changes across common tasks, like policy management and image upgrades, one of the biggest complaints that I had from a lot of network engineers, was that everything was GUI, that Cisco had gone to GUI. But they can do bulk changes on the CLI. That was a big win for them, being able to do that across all the ASAs without having to log into every single ASA and make changes. They can do a lot of bulk changes on the fly. It’s a huge time-saver.”
Other notable comments on this issue included:
“Its support for ASA, FTD, and Meraki MX devices could potentially free up staff to do other work, although I have not tried the FTD or the MX.” – Andreas F., Systems Engineer at a tech services company
“The biggest part of ROI is the improvement to the operations. Our clients with CDO are having fewer issues. Things are just not going down. People are more productive.” – Todd E.
“The solution has made our security team more productive because it allows us to have more people do the same kind of work, and they take less time doing it. It catches what could have been mistakes on our part.” – A Systems Architect at a university with over 1,000 employees
“The solution’s support for ASA, FTD, and Meraki MX devices helps free up staff time for other work.” – Jairo M.
“Defense Orchestrator has made my network team more productive, since it’s the network team which manages it.” – Richard B., Network and Data Centre Platform Manager at a manufacturing company with over 1,000 employees
“Now, with one simple click, we select the devices and set it to update on a given day, and save different configurations. It’s pretty simple and a great feature for us. Whenever we have found any problems in the devices and we want to create a new policy that applies to ten or 20 companies, we select the devices and we send the same commands to all those devices at once.” – Jairo M.
To read more Cisco Defense Orchestrator reviews, visit IT Central Station.
The post Driving Efficiency and Productivity with Cisco Defense Orchestrator appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Talos Group
Today, Talos is publishing a glimpse into the most prevalent threats we’ve observed between Nov 29 and Dec 6. As with previous roundups, this post isn’t meant to be an in-depth analysis. Instead, this post will summarize the threats we’ve observed by highlighting key behavioral characteristics, indicators of compromise, and discussing how our customers are automatically protected from these threats.
As a reminder, the information provided for the following threats in this post is non-exhaustive and current as of the date of publication. Additionally, please keep in mind that IOC searching is only one part of threat hunting. Spotting a single IOC does not necessarily indicate maliciousness. Detection and coverage for the following threats is subject to updates, pending additional threat or vulnerability analysis. For the most current information, please refer to your Firepower Management Center, Snort.org, or ClamAV.net.
Read More
Reference:
TRU12062019 – This is a JSON file that includes the IOCs referenced in this post, as well as all hashes associated with the cluster. The list is limited to 25 hashes in this blog post. As always, please remember that all IOCs contained in this document are indicators, and that one single IOC does not indicate maliciousness. See the Read More link above for more details.
The post Threat Roundup for November 29 to December 6 appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Don Meyer Network managers and security teams are facing a double-edged challenge: networks are growing far more complex and expanding across multiple perimeters just as threat vectors become increasingly difficult to detect and threats grow more sophisticated. The Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) offers a solution. According to Cisco ASA reviews and Cisco Firepower NGFW reviews on IT Central Station, they enable greater visibility into the network and applications while improving threat mitigation.
Visibility into Traffic and the Application Layer
“Before Firepower, we didn’t have any visibility about what attack was happening or what’s going on from the inside to outside or the outside to inside,” explained Ali A., a Technical Manager who uses Cisco Firepower NGFW at a comms service provider with more than 1,000 employees. He added, “After Firepower and the reporting that Firepower generates, I can see what’s going on: which user visits the malicious website, or which user uploaded or downloaded malicious code, and what the name of the code is and from which country. This is very useful and helpful for me to detect what’s going on. It enables me to solve any problem.”
Burak Y., an IT System Administrator who uses Cisco ASA at a transportation company, is dealing with a dynamic IT landscape which requires, in his view, “Security policy, controls, and visibility to be better than ever.” Mohammad R., a Security Officer at a government agency, praised ASA because it “gives us visibility into potential outbreaks as well as malicious users trying to access the site.” Iz, an Assistant Manager (Infrastructure) who uses Cisco Firepower at a small business, commented, “It has improved the security posture and visibility of our traffic.”
Visibility into applications is a critical need for network and security managers. Applications are frequent targets of malicious actors because they present an effective way to gain unauthorized access to data. Hackers also like to disrupt organizations by crippling their apps. To prevent these potentialities, Cisco NGFWs must “support application visibility,” noted a Senior Data Scientist who uses Firepower at a tech services company. He praised Firepower because it can support “application visibility and control.”
Eduardo V., an IT Infrastructure Specialist who uses Cisco Firepower at a transportation company, further addressed this need by saying, “It provides us with application visibility and control. We can see, on the dashboard, all the applications that are most used and which are under some sort of risk or vulnerability.” This matters because, “It helps a lot when we need to check some situation or issue that could be related to any attack or any violation. We can see that there are one or two or three applications that are the top-consuming applications. We can use this information to analyze if there is a deviation or if it’s something that we need to consider as normal behavior and increase the bandwidth on the site.”
Policy Management
IT Central Station members describe the importance of policy management in their selection and use of an NGFW. In this regard, according to David S., owner of a small tech company, “Cisco has better application granularity, a more flexible means of policy creation, and easier to use controls and more powerful reports than its predecessors.” Tony P., a Business Development Executive who uses Cisco ASA, further noted, “The firewall and policy side are easy to use.” A Network & Security Administrator at a financial services firm uses Cisco ASA to enforce security policy.
For Joel S., a Senior Network Engineer who uses Cisco ASA at a retailer with more than 1,000 employees, “Policy rulesets are key. The majority of what I do is create rules and work with the customers to make sure that things are getting in and out of the environment. Eduardo V. shared, “It’s not just the visibility of things, but the management of application behavior is very important. If I see that, for example, Facebook is consuming too much bandwidth, I can make a policy on the console here and deploy it to our remote offices. So the application visibility feature is one of the key parts of the solution.”
Threat Detection and Mitigation
Security managers rely on NGFWs to be their first line of defense against incoming threats and malicious exfiltration of data. As Paul C., a Security Architect who uses Cisco Firepower at a comms service provider with over 10,000 employees, noted, “FTD’s ability to provide visibility into threats is very good, if the traffic is clear.” He added, “You can stop new threats very quickly because you can get the threat intelligence deployed to all your IPSs in less than two hours. Cisco works closely with Talos and anything that Talos finds is provided in the threat intelligence of the FTDs if you have the license.”
To this point, a Regional Manager of Pre Sales at a tech services company was pleased that Cisco ASA “helps us to identify key, persistent threats so we can set policies accordingly.” An IT Manager who uses Cisco ASA with FirePOWER at a construction company spoke to this issue as well, saying he valued it for Intrusion protection. He said, “We were able to determine when we are being attacked. We needed a way to monitor threat protection and not cause latency. The product has the ability to be a consumer of threat intelligence, and be a contributor showing the maturity in threat protection posture.”
To read more Cisco NGFW reviews from real, unbiased users, visit IT Central Station.
The post The Advantages of Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs) appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Jordi Botifoll The digitization of the world has come a long way since 2016, when I wrote about how Cisco offers cybersecurity scholarships to increase the number of skilled cybersecurity specialists. And today, cybersecurity is more important than ever.
Our increasingly digital world is more and more vulnerable to cyberattacks. According to an article in Cybercrime Magazine, by 2021, cybercrime will cost $6 trillion every year in lost revenue, customers, opportunities, and out-of-pocket costs. That number is double what it was when I wrote that blog just three years ago.
Governments all over the world acknowledge that they cannot fight cybercrime alone — they need help from the private sector. Cisco and the Organization of American States (OAS) are dedicated to aiding in the efforts to close this gap. Recently, Cisco and the OAS launched a joint effort to create Cybersecurity Innovation Councils in the Latin American region.
This initiative will unite leaders and experts from the private and public sectors, NGOs, academia, and security technology vendors to work together to mitigate the risks of a digital world and democratize cybersecurity. Most importantly, Cisco and OAS will work together to leverage the benefits of digitization where it can have the most impact in Latin America.
Latin American countries are particularly vulnerable to cybercrime because there has historically been a disconnect between public and private industries, and there are few coordinated defense mechanisms to fight cybercrime. Public awareness about cybercrime is also low in Latin America, where, according to the Inter-American Development Bank, the annual cost of cybercrime is approximately $90 billion USD. By comparison, a 2018 report from the U.S. Council of Economic Advisers estimated that malicious cyberactivity cost the United States between $57 billion and $109 billion in 2016.
According to the WEF Report, Regional Risks for Doing Business 2019, “Failure of critical infrastructure” and “Data fraud or theft” are listed as the #5 and #9 risks that Latin America faces as a region. As countries across the region digitally transform, achieving their national priorities will depend on cybersecurity.
To effectively fight cybercrime, we need more cybersecurity experts. Many more. Every industry is experiencing an unprecedented demand for cybersecurity knowledge and skills. Fulfilling their mission to maintain digital safety and security, Cisco is preparing the workforce that will defend and protect our digital economy.
To accomplish that goal, Cisco and the OAS are leveraging the Cisco Networking Academy in Latin America to promote educational resources that can help close the professional skills gap in cybersecurity.
As part of our commitment to social responsibility, the Cisco Networking Academy offers a comprehensive range of cybersecurity courses, some of which are offered at no cost to educational institutions around the world. These cybersecurity courses provide four complete learning pathways for students, taking them from an entry-level understanding of online safety all the way to preparing them for a career in this thriving industry.
Practical, real-world learning experiences from qualified instructors increase the employability of students who wish to enter the digital workforce.
Further to this point, I recently participated in a Spanish-speaking interview on this topic at Cisco Live! in Cancun, Mexico with Cisco experts on Cybersecurity and the Networking Academy.
Working together, we can fight cybercrime. We can build a bridge between the Latin America cybersecurity challenges and a Latin American empowered digital society. Together, we can create a safer digital space for all Latin Americans.
The post Fighting Cybercrime and Creating Jobs for Latin America appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Anubhav Swami Today, Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced a new capability in Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) networking that is designed to make it easier and more efficient for Cisco Security customers to deploy advanced security controls in the cloud. This new capability is called Amazon VPC Ingress Routing. It allows users to specify routes for traffic flowing between a VPC and the internet or from a VPN connection, such as a private datacenter.
Amazon VPC Ingress Routing is a service that helps customers simplify the integration of network and security appliances within their network topology. With Amazon VPC Ingress Routing, customers can define routing rules at the Internet Gateway (IGW) and Virtual Private Gateway (VGW) to redirect ingress traffic to third-party appliances, before it reaches the final destination. This makes it easier for customers to deploy production-grade applications with the networking and security services they require within their Amazon VPC.
While the remainder of this post focuses on Cisco’s NGFWv and ASAv products, this capability can also be used to deploy a number of other network-based security solutions into the AWS traffic path. This includes services such as the following:
Firewall policy enforcement
Network traffic visibility
Malware detection
URL filtering
Intrusion Prevention
DNS security
This is a big win for Cisco customers deploying our security products in AWS, and we are pleased to have been an early adopter and Integration Partner with AWS on this launch.
How to Use Amazon VPC Ingress Routing with Cisco Firewalls
The configuration is achieved by creating a custom route table and associating subnet routes with the private Elastic Network Interface (ENI) of the security appliance, and then associating the public ENI with an IGW and VGW. A single firewall instance can protect multiple subnets; however, a separate instance is needed per VPC. Below are some details on the testing we performed as well as sample use cases and configuration guidance.
Use Cases / Deployment Scenarios
Cisco NGFWv/ASAv can be deployed in a VPC to protect the following traffic flows:
Traffic Traversing an Internet Gateway (IGW) To/From the Internet
Traffic Traversing a VPN Gateway (VGW) To/From a Remote VPN Peer
Benefits of Using Amazon VPC Ingress Routing with Cisco’s NGFWv and ASAv
Offload NAT from the firewall to AWS network address translation (NAT) gateway or instance
Simplify protection of multi-tier applications spanning subnets and VPCs
The scalable design makes it easy to add new subnets, and more of them
Enables bi-directional, threat-centric protection for traffic bound for private networks and the internet
POC Deployment Scenario
Enable outbound Internet connectivity and offload NAT function to AWS NAT gateway
In this scenario, the Cisco Firewall (NGFWv or ASAv) is deployed between internal services in the AWS VPC and the internet. The route table for the Internet Gateway (igw-rt) has a specific route for the Inside subnet which directs inbound traffic to the Cisco Firewall for inspection. Prior to this enhancement, the users had to NAT egress traffic on the firewall to bring back the reply packet to the same virtual appliance. This new configuration eliminates the need for an ENI on the firewall and removes the requirement to perform NAT on the firewall, thus improving performance.
Cisco NGFW/ASA with AWS IGW (routable attached to IGW) and AWS NGW to NAT outbound trafficCisco NGFW/ASA with Multiple Subnets, Three-tier Architecture Using IGW and Amazon VPC Ingress Routing
This topology expands on the previous​, demonstrating how multiple subnets can be protected by a single firewall. By utilizing the AWS NAT Gateway service, the number of protected subnets behind a single firewall can be scaled significantly beyond what was previously possible.
As with the previous architecture, the ​Cisco Firewall is deployed at the edge in routed mode, forwarding outbound traffic to the IGW. Multiple routes are configured in the IGW’s route table to direct the traffic back to the appropriate subnet while the protected subnets forward their traffic to the internal firewall interface via the NAT gateway.
Cisco NGFW/ASA three-tier Architecture with AWS IGW and VPC Ingress RoutingCisco NGFW/ASA with Multiple Subnets, Three-tier Architecture Using VGW and Amazon VPC Ingress Routing
Cisco Firewalls can also be deployed in an Amazon VPC to inspect traffic flowing through a VPN tunnel. In this case, the ​Cisco Firewall is deployed at the edge in routed mode, forwarding outbound traffic to the to a VGW. In this example, the local and remote networks are routable; therefore, the NAT gateway can be eliminated, further improving efficiency and reducing cost.
Cisco NGFW/ASA three-tier Architecture with AWS IGW and VPC Ingress RoutingIn Addition to Support for Amazon Ingress Routing, we are adding AWS Security Group management to Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO). We are also extending the existing ACI policy-based automation for L4-7 services insertion to the AWS cloud by leveraging Amazon VPC ingress routing. These integrations will make deploying L4-7 services in a hybrid cloud as well as Cisco Security at scale in AWS easier than ever.
For additional information, visit the resources below or contact your Cisco TSA or Cisco Partner.
Additional Resources
Cisco Next-Generation Firewall Cloud Solutions
Cisco NGFWv for AWS in AWS Marketplace
Cisco NGFWv for AWS Configuration Guide
Cisco ASAv for AWS in AWS Marketplace
Cisco ASAv for AWS Configuration Guide
Amazon VPC Ingress Routing
Cisco Cloud ACI
Cisco ACO Service Graph Designs
Cisco ACI MSO Configuration Guide
The post Configuring Cisco Security with Amazon VPC Ingress Routing appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice

By Edna Conway It’s a new Day for National Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. While November is recognized as the month focused on this issue in the U.S., for some time, digital transformation has widened the aperture of our lens dramatically.
This year, led by the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Critical Infrastructure and Security Agency (CISA), the public and private sector are zooming in on collaborative resilience. The accelerated convergence of information technology with operational technology running our Critical Infrastructure demands this new joint approach.
As CISA noted in its National Critical Functions, newly defined this year, “goods, people and utilities move in, out, and across the United States through distribution functions. Effective, safe, efficient, lawful, and responsive management drives our way of life, our economy, and the cohesion of our society.” Given such reliance on a dynamic global ecosystem, we must clearly identify our most trusted insiders and our most dangerous adversaries and build resilience accordingly. I believe DHS‘ designation of National Critical Functions is a major step forward toward this resiliency approach. I encourage readers to review the Interim Report recently issued by the DHS Information and Communications Technology Supply Chain Risk Management Task Force.
We must shift both our thinking and practice to effectively build resiliency and security into our critical infrastructure. Security must be approached from a layered perspective to address operational, cyber and physical risks together. Omitting any one of these important layer’s leaves glaring gaps in the security posture of our infrastructure.
Let’s explore a few fundamental building blocks:

While Access Management has traditionally been applied to IT systems, it is also uniquely applicable to any number of Critical Infrastructure aspects, such as its creation, operation and use. Mapping who needs access to what and when is how we start. The basics include:
Structuring teams and their respective access based on role
Ensuring that least privilege is applied, limiting access to the least amount of resources necessary to get the job done for a specific role
Applying that least privilege not just to information access, but also to physical access, operational control and authority. E.g. in a manufacturing plant, a camera sensor should not be allowed to control a robot outside of the camera sensor’s purview.
Verified Identity is essential to successful access management. After all, if we are granting access to the wrong person, tool or operation, we have failed. Methods for validation can range from passwords/passphrases, to electronic key cards to biometric identifiers. Methods should be deployed based on risk, e.g. an individual’s role and the operation to be undertaken.
Segmentation ensures that if one part of a network goes down, users can readily switch to another that is still functional, minimizing the failure’s impact. This concept, often used in minimizing information technology network disruption, should also be part of our infrastructure resiliency planning. Consider these basic steps:
Establish a baseline of device configurations as a foundation
Start your systems segmentation with basic categories such as enterprise, plant and process
Once you have locked down your segments, identify the key connections which are essential to each function. Then comes the fun part: map your actual connections against your list of key connections needed. And then simplify, simplify, simplify.
Third Party Risk Management becomes even more essential in today’s distributed Critical Infrastructure environments. Critical Infrastructure relies upon, in part:
Third party cloud platforms digitally enabling operations controls, data storage and workflows
Consultants performing data mining and analytics
Equipment component suppliers
Service providers working onsite to install or maintain equipment
All these third parties impact the success or failure of the security and resiliency of the Infrastructure in which they play a role.
These basic building blocks, which must be deployed by all of us, are essential to operational success. Resilient and increasingly secure Critical Infrastructure and services can only be achieved when we work together.
Additional Resources:
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Value Chain Security
The Trust Center
The post A New Day for Critical Infrastructure Security & Resilience appeared first on Cisco Blogs.

Source:: Cisco Security Notice